Synthesizing Professional Opinion of Lake Whitefish and Cisco Recruitment Drivers across the Great Lakes
Authors
Taylor A. Brown, Lars G. Rudstam, Suresh A. Sethi, Christopher Hessell, C., Erik Olsen, Jory L. Jonas, Benjamin J. Rook, Steven A. Pothoven, Sarah J. H. Beech, Erin S. Dunlop, Stephen James, Jason B. Smith, Zachary J. Amidon, Dray D. Carl, David B. Bunnell, Ralph W. Tingley, III, Brian C. Weidel, and Andrew E. Honsey
Citation
Citation: Brown, T. A., Rudstam, L. G., Sethi, S. A., Hessell, C., Olsen, E., Jonas, J. L., Rook, B. J., Pothoven, S. A., Beech, S. J. H., Dunlop, E. S., James, S., Smith, J.B., Amidon, Z. J., Carl, D. D., Bunnell, D. B., Tingley, III, R. W., Weidel, B. C., and Honsey, A. E. 2024. Synthesizing professional opinion of Lake Whitefish and Cisco recruitment drivers across the Great Lakes. Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Laurentian 2024-01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70227/glfc-laur20240101.
Abstract
Disentangling the suite of ecological drivers that explain recruitment variability for Lake Whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis and Cisco C. artedi is of critical importance for their conservation, management, and stewardship in the Laurentian Great Lakes. However, recruitment is inherently variable and can be regulated by many interacting processes, the relative importance of which can vary spatially, temporally, and ontogenetically. Given this complexity, comparisons across lakes and species that identify overarching hypotheses could efficiently guide future research. Using facilitated deliberations among fishery professionals (n = 57) with expertise in Great Lakes Coregonus spp., we synthesized current knowledge regarding (1) which biophysical processes are most important for driving contemporary recruitment between species, among lakes, and across life stages and (2) mechanisms by which those drivers regulate recruitment at key life stages. Participants affirmed the hypothesis that many drivers interact in complex ways to regulate Lake Whitefish and Cisco recruitment. Large-scale climatic processes affecting early life-stage growth and survival were consistently considered important. Other drivers were only deemed influential in certain lakes, highlighting perceived context-dependent recruitment dynamics. Notably, recruitment in Lakes Superior, Michigan, and Huron was considered limited during larval and early juvenile life stages by low productivity, whereas spawning-habitat degradation and reduced metapopulation diversity were hypothesized to limit recruitment during embryonic and larval stages in Lakes Erie and Ontario. Several drivers were hypothesized to similarly impact Lake Whitefish and Cisco during early life stages, while drivers acting on post-larval life stages were typically distinct between species. The hypotheses synthesized herein can guide future research on Lake Whitefish and Cisco recruitment dynamics in the Great Lakes.
About Laurentian
Scope
Launched in 2022, Laurentian replaces three historically separate, irregularly published Commission journals: Technical Report, Special Publication, and Miscellaneous Publication. Laurentian will continue to serve as an outlet for publication of interdisciplinary review and synthesis papers; narrowly focused material with special relevance to a single but important aspect of the Commission’s mandate under the Convention; and scientific reports from committees that work under the umbrella of the Commission. In addition, relevant papers that do not fit the format of mainstream journals owing, for instance, to length, extensive datasets, or nature of the material and its presentation, will be considered. For further clarification, authors are encouraged to review recent papers published under the three former titles, all available on the Commission’s website (www.glfc.org).
Editorial Process
All accepted submissions to Laurentian will be citation indexed by ProQuest®. In continuing with this scholarly process, all submissions will be reviewed by external experts, freelance editors, or staff editors as indicated by the nature of the material. Manuscripts should be submitted to the Commission’s Managing Editor (randye@glfc.org) to begin the editorial process. The editor may also be consulted in advance of submission, if authors are unsure regarding whether a proposed paper is suitable for Laurentian. After a submission is determined to be suitable for Laurentian, the Managing Editor will forward it to one or more freelance Technical Editors, who will arrange for peer review, as needed based on subject matter. Reviews by Technical Editors and the Managing Editor may satisfy the requirement for review, or additional reviews may be sought by a freelance editor. The Managing Editor will decide on acceptance and requirements for revision based on recommendations from Technical Editor(s) and the Managing Editor’s own review.
Style
The style guide of the American Fisheries Society (A Guide to AFS Publications Style) has been adopted for Laurentian (https://fisheries.org/books-journals/writing-tools/style-guide/).